Investor Relations Contacts
Head of Investor Relations
Manager of Investor Relations & Corporate Citizenship
|View printer-friendly version|
|FTI Consulting Study Finds REIT Executive Median Compensation Increased 7% in 2017|
According to the study, REIT executive compensation increased 7% in 2017 compared to 5% in 2016. Conducted by the
Commenting on the study,
Many of the decisions and changes to REIT compensation programs over the past couple years are rooted in a desire to add more transparency into the process. “The basis of many compensation decisions is predicated on the question of whether the pay package will be easy to communicate to shareholders and plan participants,” Ms. Gaynor added. “Many REITs have simplified their compensation programs by using fewer performance metrics and fewer buckets of compensation.”
In 2018, 15 self-managed REITs received "against" say-on-pay voting recommendations, up 4% from the prior year. According to the study, ISS continues to be critical of goal setting for incentive programs by citing the rigor of performance goals as a concern at 67% of REITs with a negative ISS say-on-pay voting recommendation. “REITs will need to consider not only the appropriateness of the performance metrics in their incentive plans, but also the rigor of the goals,” Ms. Gaynor said. From 2016 to 2017, the median actual annual incentive payout as a percent of target declined year-over-year from 129% to 123%.
The percentage of REITs now using performance-based equity seems to have stabilized in the past couple years, with 83% of REITs using such programs. In 2017, 26% of REITs included a payout modifier to their performance share plan that adjust the payout based on a secondary measure, which is typically a TSR metric. “Performance share modifiers are expected to become more prevalent given the focus on payouts above target in situations when absolute TSR is negative,” Mr. Portal added.
2018 marked the first proxy season for CEO pay-ratio disclosure. The results from the REIT industry show a significant variance, with ratios ranging from 4:1 to 567:1. “We’re seeing large variances in pay ratios at REITs, which suggests that we should proceed with caution in comparing pay ratios among REITs,” Ms. Gaynor said. “There are large discrepancies in the types of employees included in the median employee calculation, and in REIT sectors where there are a meaningful number of part-time employees, we are bound to see very high ratios.”
The 2017-2018 REIT Executive Compensation Trends study also showed that compensation trends by position varied widely: total compensation remained unchanged at 0.1% among chairpersons, while it increased 10.3% among chief financial officers, the highest increase among the seven executive categories studied and significantly higher than last year’s highest median increase of 7.4%. The study tracked compensation changes across 566 incumbents in the following positions: chairman (+0.1%), chief executive officer (+6.0%), chief operating officer (+7.6%), chief financial officer (+10.3%), chief investment officer (+3.7%), general counsel (+8.1%) and other executives (+5.6%).
Additional key findings of the
“TSR continues to be the performance metric of choice for REITs,” Ms. Gaynor added. “Operational measures are becoming more prevalent, but mostly at larger REITs that are less sensitive to the variable G&A expense associated with using these metrics. It will be interesting to see how quickly and to what degree the use of non-TSR measures for performance shares will trickle down to smaller REITs.”
About the 2017-2018 REIT Executive Compensation Trends Study